Don't use it with people, and be cautious with buildings. So its best use case is to enlarge heavily cropped distant wildlife images. It's now better in those areas, but still not very good. It works well for things like feathers, fur and foliage, but the details looked obviously fake for people and buildings.
At some point in the future I think all three products could be merged into one. Similarly Gigapixel AI doesn't have the shake correction capabilities of Sharpen AI. Then launch Topaz Gigapixel AI and click 'Start Trial' and you will see a quick tutorial. Then follow the step-by-step guide to install it on your computer. For more than that, GAI is basically inventing fake details that look plausible, but are nevertheless invented. Whilst you can resize and then sharpen, the results are not generally as good as resizing with Gigapixel AI. Click on the link in your email and you will be able to download the software package of about 25MB. I've found that GAI offers no advantage over bicubic for 2x uprezing.
So the question is, can one of them do the job of both? The reverse can be done too by first enlarge with Gigapixel AI and then shrink the result with resampling for a sharpen effect. How does the result compare with Gigapixel AI? I'm trying to evaluate whether one of them can be used for selected pictures.įor those of you using both, doesn't Sharpen AI do the job of Gigapixel AI?įirst, enlarge the picture using some conventional method like bicubic - and then apply Sharpen AI on top.
0 kommentar(er)
